Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Aviation Cockpits config #1567

Merged
merged 5 commits into from May 26, 2017

Conversation

AnticlockwisePropeller
Copy link
Contributor

@AnticlockwisePropeller AnticlockwisePropeller commented Feb 26, 2017

  • Standardised mix of tabs and spaces to tabs only
  • Added names/descriptions for existing cockpits
  • Added support for Fw190, Bearcat, and Su30 cockpits

Cleaned up config, added names/descriptions for existing cockpits, and support for Fw190, Bearcat, and Su30 cockpits
name = ModuleFuelTanks
type = Structural
basemass = -1
volume = 20 //
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

comment with no content

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

And what is this ModuleFuelTanks for, anyway?
With RO using RealFuels, we tend to place resources as TANKS within ModuleFuelTanks
https://github.com/KSP-RO/RealismOverhaul/pull/1569/files#diff-1119e2770a2add02ea460939f55e0d7bR44

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I based the new configs on the original config @NathanKell had written for the Interceptor?Cockpit. I can delete the RESOURCES and put them as TANKS within the ModuleFuelTanks, no probs.

@AnticlockwisePropeller
Copy link
Contributor Author

Deleted comment with no content and replaced RESOURCES with ModuleFuelTanks TANKS, as suggested.

@stratochief66
Copy link
Member

@AnticlockwisePropeller thanks for the changes. I'd like someone to have a chance to test these in game before they are merged, and that won't be me because I can't build or fly planes 📦
So, this PR looks good, it just may sit for a while until someone with the right skill is available to test it out.

@NathanKell
Copy link
Member

Took a quick peek at the code. Starting line 26 it's got problems: @resource modifies the first node of that name, but then the changes inside are insertions not additions so the node will have double values. That, and any other cases of that, would need to be fixed.

Loving that this is getting more love though! :)

@AnticlockwisePropeller
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks, Nathan! I'll fix that right away!

Remove inappropriate "@"s from new modules
Jacked the Starfighter and rear Voodoo seat heights up a bit, so you can see where you're going better in IVA.
@manufacturer = Sukhoi
@description = Twin seat fighter cockpit.
%rescaleFactor = 1.2 // 1.5m end diameter

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This part has messed up nodes, so add

	!node_stack_bottom = DEL
	!node_stack_bottom = DEL
	!node_stack_top = DEL
	node_stack_bottom = 0.0, -2.21851, 0.0, 0.0, -1.0, 0.0, 1
	node_stack_top = 0.0, 1.44135, 0.0, 0.0, 1.0, 0.0, 1

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice catch! Didn't notice that bc the node was in the right place, just the wrong way around

Fix messed up SU-30 Nodes
@NathanKell
Copy link
Member

Looks good to me, including Olympic's fix.

@NathanKell
Copy link
Member

Uh, how do we apply the suggestion?

@stratochief66 stratochief66 merged commit 0c0f5df into KSP-RO:master May 26, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants