Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

inspectrum: 20160403 -> 20170218 #23903

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Mar 20, 2017
Merged

Conversation

mbrgm
Copy link
Member

@mbrgm mbrgm commented Mar 14, 2017

And as a dependency:
liquid-dsp: init at 20170307

liquid-dsp is a dependency for the latest git version of inspectrum, therefore I
added it in order to be able to upgrade inspectrum.
@mention-bot
Copy link

@mbrgm, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @mogorman to be a potential reviewer.

src = fetchFromGitHub {
owner = "jgaeddert";
repo = "liquid-dsp";
rev = "8c1978fa4f5662b8849fe712be716958f29cec0e";
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

v1.3.0 is too old?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

v1.3.0 fails to compile:

/nix/store/ndqahbwrnabiaszk0s8cblhgwhid5kn0-gcc-5.4.0/lib/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/5.4.0/include/pmmintrin.h:50:1: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline '_mm_addsub_ps': target specific option mismatch
 _mm_addsub_ps (__m128 __X, __m128 __Y)
 ^
src/dotprod/src/dotprod_cccf.mmx.c:255:11: error: called from here
         s = _mm_addsub_ps( ci, cq );
           ^
In file included from src/dotprod/src/dotprod_cccf.mmx.c:49:0:

This seems to be fixed in the version I referenced.


stdenv.mkDerivation rec {
name = "inspectrum-${version}";
version = "20160403";
version = "20170218";
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

How about version 0.2, which was released on 3. February?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Version 0.2 has some bugs, which are fixed in latest git. So the question is if it's preferred to have the version with the tag or the one containing the bugfix...

@ndowens
Copy link
Contributor

ndowens commented Mar 17, 2017

I would vote bugfix one but it's up to someone that can merge this. Just voting 😀

@joachifm joachifm merged commit 12e0e67 into NixOS:master Mar 20, 2017
@mbrgm mbrgm deleted the upgrade-inspectrum branch March 20, 2017 00:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants