New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GIMP 2.10 #37915
GIMP 2.10 #37915
Conversation
8d6ce64
to
a8750a5
Compare
Edit: The latter is caused by GEGL missing from
|
I fixed the rpath bug (upstream issue), the warning is not an issue according to GIMP maintainers. |
Success on x86_64-darwin (full log) Attempted: gdk_pixbuf, gegl_0_4, mypaint-brushes The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on x86_64-darwin: gimp, gimpPlugins.lqrPlugin, gimpPlugins.ufraw, ufraw Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on x86_64-linux (full log) Attempted: gdk_pixbuf, gegl_0_4, gimp, gimpPlugins.lqrPlugin, gimpPlugins.ufraw, mypaint-brushes, ufraw Partial log (click to expand)
|
Failure on x86_64-linux (full log) Attempted: gdk_pixbuf, gegl_0_4, gimp, gimpPlugins.lqrPlugin, gimpPlugins.ufraw, gmic, mypaint-brushes, ufraw Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on x86_64-darwin (full log) Attempted: gdk_pixbuf, gegl_0_4, mypaint-brushes The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on x86_64-darwin: gimp, gimpPlugins.lqrPlugin, gimpPlugins.ufraw, gmic, ufraw Partial log (click to expand)
|
120d5e0
to
6da9d93
Compare
Success on x86_64-darwin (full log) Attempted: gdk_pixbuf, gegl_0_4, mypaint-brushes The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on x86_64-darwin: gimp, gimpPlugins.lqrPlugin, gmic, ufraw Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on x86_64-linux (full log) Attempted: gdk_pixbuf, gegl_0_4, gimp, gimpPlugins.lqrPlugin, gmic, mypaint-brushes, ufraw Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on x86_64-darwin (full log) Attempted: gdk_pixbuf, gegl_0_4, mypaint-brushes The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on x86_64-darwin: gimp, gimpPlugins.lqrPlugin, gmic, ufraw Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on x86_64-linux (full log) Attempted: gdk_pixbuf, gegl_0_4, gimp, gimpPlugins.lqrPlugin, gmic, mypaint-brushes, ufraw Partial log (click to expand)
|
Failure on aarch64-linux (full log) Attempted: gdk_pixbuf, gegl_0_4, gimp, gimpPlugins.lqrPlugin, gmic, mypaint-brushes, ufraw Partial log (click to expand)
|
Failure on aarch64-linux (full log) Attempted: gdk_pixbuf, gegl_0_4, gimp, gimpPlugins.lqrPlugin, gmic, mypaint-brushes, ufraw Partial log (click to expand)
|
Failure on aarch64-linux (full log) Attempted: gdk_pixbuf, gegl_0_4, gimp, gimpPlugins.lqrPlugin, gmic, mypaint-brushes, ufraw Partial log (click to expand)
|
Also ufraw does not seem to detect raw images it did with 2.8, although the plug-in seems to get loaded. |
Success on x86_64-linux (full log) Attempted: gdk_pixbuf, gegl_0_4, gimp, gimpPlugins.lqrPlugin, gmic, mypaint-brushes, ufraw The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on x86_64-linux: gimpPlugins.focusblur, gimpPlugins.texturize Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on x86_64-darwin (full log) Attempted: gdk_pixbuf, gegl_0_4, mypaint-brushes The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on x86_64-darwin: gimp, gimpPlugins.focusblur, gimpPlugins.lqrPlugin, gimpPlugins.texturize, gmic, ufraw Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on x86_64-darwin (full log) Attempted: gdk_pixbuf, gegl_0_4, mypaint-brushes The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on x86_64-darwin: gimp, gimp-with-plugins, gimpPlugins.focusblur, gimpPlugins.lqrPlugin, gimpPlugins.texturize, gmic, ufraw Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on x86_64-linux (full log) Attempted: gdk_pixbuf, gegl_0_4, gimp, gimp-with-plugins, gimpPlugins.lqrPlugin, gmic, mypaint-brushes, ufraw The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on x86_64-linux: gimpPlugins.focusblur, gimpPlugins.texturize Partial log (click to expand)
|
Failure on aarch64-linux (full log) Attempted: gdk_pixbuf, gegl_0_4, gimp, gimpPlugins.lqrPlugin, gmic, mypaint-brushes, ufraw The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on aarch64-linux: gimpPlugins.focusblur, gimpPlugins.texturize Partial log (click to expand)
|
Failure on aarch64-linux (full log) Attempted: gdk_pixbuf, gegl_0_4, gimp, gimp-with-plugins, gimpPlugins.lqrPlugin, gmic, mypaint-brushes, ufraw The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on aarch64-linux: gimpPlugins.focusblur, gimpPlugins.texturize Partial log (click to expand)
|
@jtojnar any change to get this backported? GIMP 2.10 is a real game changer and I'm quite sure that some more folks building from stable would love to use this as well %) |
@Ma27 I do not think so, it depends on recent fontconfig. |
@jtojnar understood, when having a closer look the change seems indeed quite complex. |
Sure, the repo is MIT licensed after all. |
@jtojnar I know I was just unsure if you don't want to do the backport (which is absolutely fine) or if there are further technical reasons I'm missing %) |
I just do not really care about release branches. One thing to consider is whether we want to have GIMP 2.10 replace 2.8 – since three plug-ins will no longer work with 2.10 (see above), taking the policy literally, that would not be allowed. |
We could have both versions. |
just talked to @fpletz about this issue, he says (as well) that there are way too much dependencies to backport so this might not be such a good idea :-) |
Motivation for this change
https://www.gimp.org/release-notes/gimp-2.10.html
Depends on #36371
Things done
build-use-sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS)nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
./result/bin/
)