Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

mesa: 17.3.6 -> 17.3.7 -> 18.0.0, llvm6, libdrm bump #38360

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

mesa: 17.3.6 -> 17.3.7 -> 18.0.0, llvm6, libdrm bump #38360

wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

dtzWill
Copy link
Member

@dtzWill dtzWill commented Apr 3, 2018

Bump libdrm while at it, required by newer mesa.

Picking up version bumps while working on GL-bits
of NixOS-musl work, but no particularly pressing
reason to update and needs more testing.

  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option build-use-sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@dtzWill
mesa: 17.3.6 -> 17.3.7
a42fc5a
@dtzWill
libdrm: 2.4.90 -> 2.4.91
cc4813c 
This update is required by mesa update:

configure: error: radeonsi can't use libdrm 2.4.90 due to a compatibility issue. Use a newer or older version.
@dtzWill
mesa: 17.3.7 -> 18.0.0
dcb6a2d
@dtzWill
mesa: use llvm6
415e782
@dtzWill dtzWill requested a review from vcunat April 3, 2018 00:18
@vcunat
Copy link
Member

vcunat commented Apr 3, 2018 •
edited

Upstream considers mesa-*.0.0 as testing releases and recommends only the next release for general usage. That's what I/we've been following in nixpkgs so far. The other parts seem OK to me, though I haven't done any testing etc. libdrm is also in #38217.

@dtzWill
Copy link
Member Author

dtzWill commented Apr 3, 2018

Oh that's right, thanks! I actually seem to recall you telling me that--but couldn't find a PR where I suggested bumping to a x.0.0 so thought I was thinking of something else.... I'll remember now! ;)

@dtzWill
Copy link
Member Author

dtzWill commented Apr 3, 2018

Closing in favor of #38385.

@dtzWill dtzWill closed this Apr 3, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@vcunat vcunat Awaiting requested review from vcunat

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
2 participants
@dtzWill @vcunat