New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
dit: init at 0.4 #38670
dit: init at 0.4 #38670
Conversation
42eceef
to
46e4d68
Compare
Is it ok to add a package with broken darwin support or should i remove darwin support completely and readd when problem is fixed upstream? |
@GrahamcOfBorg build dit |
No attempt on x86_64-darwin (full log) The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on x86_64-darwin: dit Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on x86_64-linux (full log) Attempted: dit Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on aarch64-linux (full log) Attempted: dit Partial log (click to expand)
|
Which dependency for |
@Mic92 librt |
But where is it used? Because it is not in |
I'm not sure, but i think it's part of linux. http://refspecs.linuxbase.org/LSB_3.0.0/LSB-PDA/LSB-PDA/librt.html#STD-223-67-TBL-LIBRT-CLO-INTS ./configure fails on darwin, as you see in the linked issue. |
Since i don't got a response in the upstream issue yet and they don't do very frequently releases i assume it will take some time until darwin is supported. So i removed darwin support for now (still have it in a dit-darwin branch in my nixpkgs fork). So good to merge now from my side. |
Motivation for this change
We don't have enough editors packaged. Just kidding.
I want to try this editor out which might be a good alternative to nano.
Things done
build-use-sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS)nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
./result/bin/
)