Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ape: init at 6.7-131003 #36957

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

ape: init at 6.7-131003 #36957

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

yrashk
Copy link
Contributor

@yrashk yrashk commented Mar 14, 2018

Motivation for this change

Attempto APE is not in Nixpkgs

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option build-use-sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@yrashk
Copy link
Contributor Author

yrashk commented Mar 18, 2018

Any feedback? Anything I can address/help with?

@yrashk
Copy link
Contributor Author

yrashk commented Mar 27, 2018

Any concerns about these derivations?

@yrashk
Copy link
Contributor Author

yrashk commented Apr 12, 2018

Whom should I ping to review this PR?

callPackage ./. {
pname = "ape-clex";
lexicon = "${attemptoClex}/clex_lexicon.pl";
description = "Parser for Attempto Controlled English (ACE) with a large lexicon (~100,000 entries)";
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why are these values not in default.nix?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

They are -- there are just two variations of the package, with the small lexicon and a larger one. Smaller lexicon is covered by LGPL, however, the larger one is GPL.

@yrashk
Copy link
Contributor Author

yrashk commented May 18, 2018

Closed for inactivity.

@yrashk yrashk closed this May 18, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants