New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
geogebra: add archive.org link for 5-0-444-0 #37757
Conversation
The `geogebra` package is subject to break as upstream removes versioned packages from their download server when five new releases are comming. This is why I had to fix almost monthly the package by bumping the version (these can be found by running `git log --online | grep geogebra:`). As the package didn't cause any issues for several months now I guess that using `archive.org` seems to be a suitable solution for now. /cc @sternenseemann @matthewbauer
@volth makes sense. But I guess that I need someone with access to |
@GrahamcOfBorg build geogebra |
No attempt on aarch64-linux (full log) The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on aarch64-linux: geogebra Partial log (click to expand)
|
No attempt on x86_64-linux (full log) The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on x86_64-linux: geogebra Partial log (click to expand)
|
No attempt on x86_64-darwin (full log) The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on x86_64-darwin: geogebra Partial log (click to expand)
|
tarballs are not cached for this package because: |
true, this has been introduced by 8df7571#diff-bb69272631310093655bbfd118634d07 In the end I'm not sure if we want to create some extra load to our infrastructure for such a small package which just consists of some JARs being unpacked (as stated in the commit message). As I'm no core member of this project so I'd like to know how you'd proceed here. Use our binary caching and should we keep the |
@Mic92 what's your opinion regarding the tarball caching / usage of archive.org? |
Should be ok. |
great, thanks for merging! |
Motivation for this change
The
geogebra
package is subject to break as upstream removes versionedpackages from their download server when five new releases are comming.
This is why I had to fix almost monthly the package by bumping the
version (these can be found by running
git log --online | grep geogebra:
). As the package didn't cause any issues for several monthsnow I guess that using
archive.org
seems to be a suitable solution fornow.
/cc @sternenseemann @matthewbauer
Things done
build-use-sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS)nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
./result/bin/
)