Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

nixos/acme: Fix letsencrypt test nginx servernames #37759

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

srhb
Copy link
Contributor

@srhb srhb commented Mar 25, 2018

Motivation for this change

NixOS test died with: letsencrypt# [ 37.455263] nginx-pre-start[910]: nginx: [emerg] could not build server_names_hash, you should increase server_names_hash_bucket_size: 32

Apparently, nginx defaults it based on the cpu advertised on the system.

Things done

Increased server_names_hash_bucket_size to 64 on the letsencrypt host.

I think this is sufficient to fix the issue on 18.03, but something else is also breaking the test on master. This change should be sensible either way.

  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option build-use-sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Copy link
Contributor

@wmertens wmertens left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lgtm, but @aszlig was also looking at this. I don't know this option but found https://gist.github.com/muhammadghazali/6c2b8c80d5528e3118613746e0041263

@domenkozar
Copy link
Member

Is this still needed?

@srhb
Copy link
Contributor Author

srhb commented Sep 25, 2018

Doesn't look like it!

@srhb srhb closed this Sep 25, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants