New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
avidemux: fix build with glibc 2.27 #38815
Conversation
No attempt on aarch64-linux (full log) The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on aarch64-linux: avidemux Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on x86_64-linux (full log) Attempted: avidemux Partial log (click to expand)
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
First of all thanks a lot for fixing this, I only have one question: rather than using substituteInPlace
(which isn't IMO that obvious to reason about changes in the code itself) shouldn't we use the patch from some kind of upstream source (such as using mean00/avidemux2@afdd9c4 with fetchpatch
?)
As it was just a single occurrence I admit I didn't think about looking for a patch.. But if a patch is available then I agree that would be preferable, amended the commit accordingly. Thanks for the feedback! |
No attempt on aarch64-linux (full log) The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on aarch64-linux: avidemux Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on x86_64-linux (full log) Attempted: avidemux Partial log (click to expand)
|
as @GrahamcOfBorg seems to be happy with the patch, I guess that we could just merge it, right? (/cc @abbradar you're one of the |
Thanks! |
Motivation for this change
Doesn't build with glibc 2.27.
/cc @abbradar @Ma27
Things done
build-use-sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS)nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
./result/bin/
)