New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
jfbview: 0.5.4 -> 0.5.5 #37654
jfbview: 0.5.4 -> 0.5.5 #37654
Conversation
Semi-automatic update generated by https://github.com/ryantm/nix-update tools. These checks were done: - built on NixOS /tmp/tmp.L8dOowJKxk /home/ryantm/.cache/nixpkgs /home/ryantm/.cache/nixpkgs - Warning: no binary found that responded to help or version flags. (This warning appears even if the package isn't expected to have binaries.) - directory tree listing: https://gist.github.com/d0c7d347a8f411b60cafc2bc64a3bb19
No attempt on x86_64-linux (full log) The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on x86_64-linux: jfbview Partial log (click to expand)
|
No attempt on aarch64-linux (full log) The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on aarch64-linux: jfbview Partial log (click to expand)
|
This package was marked broken in #36654 , but has recently been fixed according to upstream maintainer. @ryantm how does your tool handle packages marked as broken? Did it really successfully build this before making the PR (according to ofborg above it's still marked as broken). |
No attempt on x86_64-darwin (full log) The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on x86_64-darwin: jfbview Partial log (click to expand)
|
@xeji I think my bot might be using my nixpkgs config which has
in it. It really successfully built it. See the directory tree listing for what is in the result. |
Cool. Builds and seems to work.
|
I prefer the human intervention approach. I can use nix eval to check that broken is set and warn about it in the PR text. |
Think so too. If it was broken it should be manually tested before merging. |
Please remove these lines before merging, package is no longer broken:
|
@xeji done. |
Success on x86_64-linux (full log) Attempted: jfbview Partial log (click to expand)
|
No attempt on x86_64-darwin (full log) The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on x86_64-darwin: jfbview Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on aarch64-linux (full log) Attempted: jfbview Partial log (click to expand)
|
Semi-automatic update generated by https://github.com/ryantm/nix-update tools. These checks were done: