-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
helper tool to track XenServer components within nixpkgs #8673
Conversation
@@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ | |||
{stdenv, fetchurl, fetchgit, nix-template-rpm }: | |||
|
|||
# Xenserver buildroot of somehow around XenServer 6.5. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This comment might make a good meta.longDescription.
I added some minor comments. I don't have the proper context to review this properly, but I guess it can't hurt to merge it in since it doesn't change any existing stuff. Can you at least confirm you've tested it and it works as expected? |
@falsifian, thank you very much for the detailed review! I'll address all the points that you raised. |
Thanks. The most important thing: can you confirm you've used this expression and it works? The other points are minor and can be fixed after merging this. |
# Xenserver is not an application by itself, but just a collection of components. | ||
# This package only provides the build inputs to actually build the components of xenserver. | ||
stdenv.mkDerivation rec { | ||
name = "xenserver-${version}"; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should the name be xenserver-buildroot?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, that would be better, yes.
@falsifian, thank you very much for your efforts in getting the PR merged. The script works, but part of it depends heavily on the naming of the ocaml modules in PR #8705 and #8672, which is about to change. So once the other two PRs are fixed I would update this PR accordingly before getting it merged. |
ping :) |
No description provided.