New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
jdupes: 1.9 -> 1.10 #39434
jdupes: 1.9 -> 1.10 #39434
Conversation
Semi-automatic update generated by https://github.com/ryantm/nixpkgs-update tools. This update was made based on information from https://repology.org/metapackage/jdupes/versions. These checks were done: - built on NixOS - ran ‘/nix/store/dcdj2ipjj5qa0sspf0p5nxdxhsv9j5g8-jdupes-1.10/bin/jdupes help’ got 0 exit code - found 1.10 with grep in /nix/store/dcdj2ipjj5qa0sspf0p5nxdxhsv9j5g8-jdupes-1.10 - directory tree listing: https://gist.github.com/1c1bb095e8f7237f06f927b1c89ffa23
Failure on aarch64-linux (full log) Attempted: jdupes Partial log (click to expand)
|
Failure on x86_64-linux (full log) Attempted: jdupes Partial log (click to expand)
|
Failure on x86_64-darwin (full log) Attempted: jdupes Partial log (click to expand)
|
@r-ryantm what happened with the hashes? |
It might be that the release notes were modified when they released 1.10.1. I can try to diff it later. We should not merge this anyway, there is a new version 1.10.1 that fixes a command line option. |
Well, I don't see any differences in the source r-ryantm used and the current download, so maybe it's something with how fetchFromGitHub works or some git metadata/tags. |
Semi-automatic update generated by https://github.com/ryantm/nixpkgs-update tools.
This update was made based on information from https://repology.org/metapackage/jdupes/versions.
These checks were done:
cc @romildo for review