You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For #4235 we introduced a workaround that forces the containing methods to jit when a block jits. However this is still not ideal, since if the containing method is only called once it will never see the jitted block. We would like to do a better job of jitting blocks in this situation, allowing them to run atop an interpreted containing method, but there are many issues here:
Management of scopes and frames in the presence of JIT optimization.
Structural differences in how interpreter versus JIT handles on-stack state
This would happen with post-9.2 performance work, ideally, so I'll target 9.2.1 for now.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For #4235 we introduced a workaround that forces the containing methods to jit when a block jits. However this is still not ideal, since if the containing method is only called once it will never see the jitted block. We would like to do a better job of jitting blocks in this situation, allowing them to run atop an interpreted containing method, but there are many issues here:
This would happen with post-9.2 performance work, ideally, so I'll target 9.2.1 for now.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: