Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

skhd: Bump 0.0.14 to 0.1.1 #40292

Merged
merged 1 commit into from May 10, 2018
Merged

skhd: Bump 0.0.14 to 0.1.1 #40292

merged 1 commit into from May 10, 2018

Conversation

periklis
Copy link
Contributor

Motivation for this change

@LnL7 This time with modal support ;)

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option build-use-sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@periklis periklis changed the title skhd: Bump 0.0.14 to 0.1.0 skhd: Bump 0.0.14 to 0.1.1 May 10, 2018
@LnL7
Copy link
Member

LnL7 commented May 10, 2018

Nice, I know the branch was finally merged but didn't realise it was released already!

@LnL7 LnL7 merged commit 9a492d1 into NixOS:master May 10, 2018
@periklis
Copy link
Contributor Author

Although modal support landed, i hardly can imagine a daily workflow needing it, since my work is emacs-centric. Do you?

@periklis periklis deleted the darwin-skhd branch July 25, 2018 09:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@LnL7 LnL7 LnL7 approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 0
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@periklis @LnL7 @GrahamcOfBorg