You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I like to build Lix with DMD, the reference compiler. It has the newest bugfixes, but also allows newer D constructs that are not yet allowed in GDC or LDC.
In the next months, I should look into building Lix with GDC or LDC. Maybe it's easy to compile with them, maybe it's hard. If Lix is easy to adapt to them, I should do it.
On Debian, their GDC package sits in the default repositories and is easier to fetch than the DMD package (must register separate repository on the Debian installation).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The LDC build should pass without warnings on Arch and Debian, and likely on Windows.
I haven't looked into GDC yet.
SimonN
changed the title
GDC and LDC, see how difficult Lix is to compile with them
Building with GDC: How difficult is it? (DMD and LDC2 work for me)
Oct 19, 2018
Reason: Very often, GDC is based on outdated DMD versions that do not support D features required by Lix or Lix's dependencies. I support builds with DMD and LDC.
Lix 0.9.16
I like to build Lix with DMD, the reference compiler. It has the newest bugfixes, but also allows newer D constructs that are not yet allowed in GDC or LDC.
In the next months, I should look into building Lix with GDC or LDC. Maybe it's easy to compile with them, maybe it's hard. If Lix is easy to adapt to them, I should do it.
On Debian, their GDC package sits in the default repositories and is easier to fetch than the DMD package (must register separate repository on the Debian installation).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: