-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 925
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
[Truffle] Removed incorrect transfer.
- 9.4.12.0
- 9.4.11.0
- 9.4.10.0
- 9.4.9.0
- 9.4.8.0
- 9.4.7.0
- 9.4.6.0
- 9.4.5.0
- 9.4.4.0
- 9.4.3.0
- 9.4.2.0
- 9.4.1.0
- 9.4.0.0
- 9.3.15.0
- 9.3.14.0
- 9.3.13.0
- 9.3.12.0
- 9.3.11.0
- 9.3.10.0
- 9.3.9.0
- 9.3.8.0
- 9.3.7.0
- 9.3.6.0
- 9.3.5.0
- 9.3.4.0
- 9.3.3.0
- 9.3.2.0
- 9.3.1.0
- 9.3.0.0
- 9.2.21.0
- 9.2.20.1
- 9.2.20.0
- 9.2.19.0
- 9.2.18.0
- 9.2.17.0
- 9.2.16.0
- 9.2.15.0
- 9.2.14.0
- 9.2.13.0
- 9.2.12.0
- 9.2.11.1
- 9.2.11.0
- 9.2.10.0
- 9.2.9.0
- 9.2.8.0
- 9.2.7.0
- 9.2.6.0
- 9.2.5.0
- 9.2.4.1
- 9.2.4.0
- 9.2.3.0
- 9.2.2.0
- 9.2.1.0
- 9.2.0.0
- 9.1.17.0
- 9.1.16.0
- 9.1.15.0
- 9.1.14.0
- 9.1.13.0
- 9.1.12.0
- 9.1.11.0
- 9.1.10.0
- 9.1.9.0
- 9.1.8.0
- 9.1.7.0
- 9.1.6.0
- 9.1.5.0
- 9.1.4.0
- 9.1.3.0
- 9.1.2.0
- 9.1.1.0
- 9.1.0.0
Showing
1 changed file
with
0 additions
and
1 deletion.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
0caf4db
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could be profiled though?
0caf4db
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe automatic branch probability is enough here?
If not just specifying the probability might be better and more practical, in practice it's very likely to happen that the field is not set, right?
0caf4db
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You mean branch probability in the CPU? I was more interested in removing the code in the PE.
0caf4db
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes. It's just an
Invoke
, and it would only fold interestingly if the Rope is constant, right?0caf4db
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For
LeafRope
, which all String literals are, the field will be non-null. ForConcatRope
andSubstringRope
, it'll benull
on first access. I was trying to not penalize the cases where we have the bytes already.