-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fuse travis-ci #2324
fuse travis-ci #2324
Conversation
@thelinuxkid Master should be green now if you want to test |
looks like theres an actual issue on the osx travis tests, it cant find fusermount |
It looks like it's missing |
You would have to rebase is on top of master again and see how .travis.yml works now. |
Hmm. I have already rebased and that line is there: https://github.com/thelinuxkid/go-ipfs/blob/master/.travis.yml#L23. |
I see. I think the package changed: https://travis-ci.org/thelinuxkid/go-ipfs/jobs/109452862#L182. |
@thelinuxkid i see whats going wrong here, mind if i push a commit? |
Sure. I found a couple of things though. I had to do a |
I already made the changes to the |
ooooh, the multiple components thing is definitely not considered by gx... I'll fix that |
I am going to leave the |
0fe7fdf
to
b4e5c84
Compare
@whyrusleeping I am seeing the fusermount error on osx now https://travis-ci.org/thelinuxkid/go-ipfs/jobs/109495802#L3695. It's the only thing failing at the moment. I will look further into it. |
@thelinuxkid yeah, i pushed the multiple GOPATH fix last night |
@whyrusleeping Cool. Just tested it. Works for me. Also rebased. Let me know how this change looks thelinuxkid@85b9ef3. I couldn't get the upgrade to work without the |
@thelinuxkid what was the failure case fixed by adding that |
@whyrusleeping |
43a1cd2
to
2aec997
Compare
f49a2eb
to
e3a9d0c
Compare
@whyrusleeping Tests passing. Please merge. |
There was a stall error (unrelated to this). But it the test passed at first retry: https://travis-ci.org/ipfs/go-ipfs/builds/113009295 |
@chriscool wanna take a look at this one? |
pending chris' feedback, this LGTM |
Both of the travis failures are fuse issues... We've spent a lot of time lately making sure our CI is green. I need to think about what we want to do here, i'd prefer not to merge in things that make our CI less green, but I also don't want to delay this code merging any longer. |
Except the points about unmounting this LGTM! |
Also is a fix for #2214 needed? |
Maybe we could enable the fuse testing under travis CIs 'allowed failures' target for now: https://docs.travis-ci.com/user/customizing-the-build/#Rows-that-are-Allowed-to-Fail |
@whyrusleeping what failures are you referring to? @chriscool you can close #2214 |
@whyrusleeping OK. I was looking at my own travis tests which are passing. I see the |
@whyrusleeping @chriscool can the
|
License: MIT Signed-off-by: Andres Buritica <andres@thelinuxkid.com>
License: MIT Signed-off-by: Andres Buritica <andres@thelinuxkid.com>
The current Travis Trusty build does not have ipv6 support License: MIT Signed-off-by: Andres Buritica <andres@thelinuxkid.com>
License: MIT Signed-off-by: Andres Buritica <andres@thelinuxkid.com>
License: MIT Signed-off-by: Andres Buritica <andres@thelinuxkid.com>
License: MIT Signed-off-by: Andres Buritica <andres@thelinuxkid.com>
License: MIT Signed-off-by: Andres Buritica <andres@thelinuxkid.com>
License: MIT Signed-off-by: Andres Buritica <andres@thelinuxkid.com>
License: MIT Signed-off-by: Andres Buritica <andres@thelinuxkid.com>
License: MIT Signed-off-by: Andres Buritica <andres@thelinuxkid.com>
travis-ci image seems to support ipv6 now License: MIT Signed-off-by: Andres Buritica <andres@thelinuxkid.com>
License: MIT Signed-off-by: Andres Buritica <andres@thelinuxkid.com>
Closing as inactive, reopen as necessary |
Waiting for master to be green again to test changes.