Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
linux-hardened: Disable GCC_PLUGIN_RANDSTRUCT
- Loading branch information
1 parent
48f0389
commit 5dda132
Showing
1 changed file
with
0 additions
and
5 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
5dda132
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why was this removed? I'm thinking of adding it back.
Ideally the reason would have been mentioned in the commit description...
5dda132
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agreed. If you can, maybe try building with this patch reverted, if it works I think we should revert, unless there's a good reason not to.
5dda132
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll send a PR once #53369 is in.
5dda132
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've pushed a revert of this along with a batch of other hardened related stuff.
5dda132
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@delroth unfortunately I've had to re-revert, turns out there are some problems with out-of-tree modules ...
5dda132
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well that would explain the issue I was having with wireguard which I was procrastinating to debug... :/
Since I have a use case I'll be happy to try and look into it. I'll file an issue for tracking for now so we can at least share findings.
5dda132
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
#53592