Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

gnuplot: 5.0.6 -> 5.2.0 #29679

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 1, 2017
Merged

gnuplot: 5.0.6 -> 5.2.0 #29679

merged 1 commit into from Oct 1, 2017

Conversation

mimame
Copy link
Member

@mimame mimame commented Sep 22, 2017

Motivation for this change

Update gnuplot to last version

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option build-use-sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • Linux
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@fpletz
Copy link
Member

fpletz commented Sep 27, 2017

Hash is incorrect for me:

output path ‘/nix/store/5grq69l1fwgzm2lqlnyvly4f2sj07sy6-gnuplot-5.2.0.tar.gz’ has sha256 hash ‘1grhp5i29v1krrn1m36n68ls6vakvbw4x60im26b7h55rkvx61vs’ when ‘0hqyajcnlk822fk7hyl07sqk6a75n93awbdl3ydk9fd6l4jn9zkx’ was expected

@mimame
Copy link
Member Author

mimame commented Sep 29, 2017

@fpletz, Could you review this?
My output is:

output path ‘/nix/store/sjw2wzwnx4jpglr9gwfn3ds0mdm7y2x4-gnuplot-5.2.0.tar.gz’ has sha256 hash ‘0hqyajcnlk822fk7hyl07sqk6a75n93awbdl3ydk9fd6l4jn9zkx’

@orivej orivej merged commit 6ea9e0d into NixOS:master Oct 1, 2017
@orivej
Copy link
Contributor

orivej commented Oct 1, 2017

The hash is correct for me on two geographically distant machines.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@lovek323 lovek323 Awaiting requested review from lovek323

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
8.has: package (update)
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
4 participants
@mimame @fpletz @orivej @joachifm