Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

lxc: 2.0.8 -> 2.1.0 #30407

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 20, 2017
Merged

lxc: 2.0.8 -> 2.1.0 #30407

merged 1 commit into from Oct 20, 2017

Conversation

sorki
Copy link
Member

@sorki sorki commented Oct 14, 2017

Related to #30023

Note that this comes with new configuration format,
for migrating see https://linuxcontainers.org/lxc/news/#lxc-21-release-announcement-5th-of-september-2017

cc @wkennington @globin @fpletz

Motivation for this change

lxc: 2.0.8 -> 2.1.0

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option build-use-sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Related to NixOS#30023

Note that this comes with new configuration format,
for migrating see https://linuxcontainers.org/lxc/news/#lxc-21-release-announcement-5th-of-september-2017
@Mic92
Copy link
Member

Mic92 commented Oct 14, 2017

We probably should also start looking into pam_cgfs in lxcfs to support the new hybrid cgroup layout.

@joachifm
Copy link
Contributor

@Mic92 but this is okay otherwise, right?

@Mic92 Mic92 merged commit 3219511 into NixOS:master Oct 20, 2017
@Mic92
Copy link
Member

Mic92 commented Oct 20, 2017

Thanks! The old lxcfs still works more or less.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants