there does not appear to be a good solution for using route placehold…

…ers with embedded applications (closes #1148)
mojolicious · Dec 1, 2017 · 1801917 · 1801917
1 parent 9c08894
commit 1801917
Showing 1 changed file with 5 additions and 0 deletions.
diff --git a/lib/Mojolicious/Guides/Routing.pod b/lib/Mojolicious/Guides/Routing.pod
@@ -1024,6 +1024,11 @@ containing a C<handler> method accepting L<Mojolicious::Controller> objects.
 
   1;
 
+The host application will only share very little information with the embedded
+application through the stash. So you cannot currently use route placeholders in
+routes leading to embedded applications, since that would cause problems with
+L<Mojolicious::Controller/"url_for">.
+
 =head2 Application plugins
 
 You can even package applications as self-contained reusable plugins.