Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

welle-io: init at 1.0-rc1 #32865

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 21, 2017
Merged

welle-io: init at 1.0-rc1 #32865

merged 1 commit into from Dec 21, 2017

Conversation

ck3d
Copy link
Contributor

@ck3d ck3d commented Dec 19, 2017

Motivation for this change
Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option build-use-sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@@ -14909,6 +14909,8 @@ with pkgs;

wavrsocvt = callPackage ../applications/misc/audio/wavrsocvt { };

welle-io = qt5.callPackage ../applications/misc/welle-io { };
Copy link
Contributor

@orivej orivej Dec 21, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please use libsForQt5.callPackage. It is different from qt5.callPackage , which is not meant for use outside of the definition of Qt.

];

nativeBuildInputs = [ cmake pkgconfig ];

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'd appreciate if attributes were in the familiar order: nativeBuildInputs, buildInputs, cmakeFlags, enableParallelBuilding (which is now the default for cmake, qmake and meson projects).

@ck3d
Copy link
Contributor Author

ck3d commented Dec 21, 2017

Thanks a lot for reviewing. I updated the PR.

@orivej
Copy link
Contributor

orivej commented Dec 21, 2017

Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants