Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Patch/sulphurtypes #399

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 15, 2017
Merged

Patch/sulphurtypes #399

merged 1 commit into from Dec 15, 2017

Conversation

johnmay
Copy link
Member

@johnmay johnmay commented Dec 11, 2017

No description provided.

@johnmay
Copy link
Member Author

johnmay commented Dec 11, 2017

Note test failures I need to look at

@johnmay
Copy link
Member Author

johnmay commented Dec 12, 2017

Rolled back problematic commit, whilst it's more correct to use valence in the CDK hydrogen added there was some legacy code that used just the hybridisation type and single bonds.

@egonw
Copy link
Member

egonw commented Dec 15, 2017

@johnmay, is this patch now good to go? Sulphurs are hard, thanks for this fix!

I think it's important to keep this perception code (not necessarily this implementation), but we do not always start with SMILES, and just may need to figure out the atom type from the input we get...

@johnmay
Copy link
Member Author

johnmay commented Dec 15, 2017

Yes good to go

@egonw egonw merged commit 8a1fdd5 into master Dec 15, 2017
@johnmay johnmay deleted the patch/sulphurtypes branch March 18, 2018 20:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants