@matthewbauer, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @ndowens, @vcunat and @acowley to be potential reviewers.

I get this when building cwebbin, do you get the same with nix-build -A cwebbin.src --check?

unpacking source archive /private/var/folders/qv/5k4lhv3n1hg2jk29cj3smtp00000gn/T/nix-build-cwebbin-cwebbin-22p-src.drv-0/cwebbin-22p.tar.gz
output path ‘/nix/store/pb6ag3d3cznzklaqfbamfs4kk4q13mm1-cwebbin-cwebbin-22p-src’ has r:sha256 hash ‘180i5af07zhjv7cdi1wggs9b03iwj07ay7dkvfdwi1ljm6rqm4dj’ when ‘0zf93016hm9i74i2v384rwzcw16y3hg5vc2mibzkx1rzvqa50yfr’ was expected

I uploaded a fix.

Oh it's actually nix-build -A cwebbin.cweb --check not the src, that has a different hash for me.

@LnL7 Ok got it now, I think. How do you feel about these kind of "miscellaneous" pull requests? I can definitely open separate PRs for each commit but these are mostly unused, tiny packages that I think can be grouped together.

I don't have a problem with it for trivial changes like this. It's just generally preferred to keep unrelated changes separate to reduce the chance of good changes getting blocked by another issue or unrelated merge conflicts.