Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

kubernetes: fix interpolation error and move services to own target #24921

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Apr 15, 2017

Conversation

peterhoeg
Copy link
Member

Motivation for this change

The first commit is a straight up fix for a bug where enabling the cni network
plugin will make evaluation fail.

The second part shifts the kubernetes services into their own slice and makes
the launch happen via a dedicated kubernetes target.

The reason for moving into its own slice and target is that it makes starting
and stopping far easier plus it allows for resource allocations.

Cc: @offlinehacker

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing
    (nix.useSandbox on NixOS,
    or option build-use-sandbox in nix.conf
    on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • Linux
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@mention-bot
Copy link

@peterhoeg, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @offlinehacker, @fpletz and @nckx to be potential reviewers.

@offlinehacker
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks!

@offlinehacker offlinehacker merged commit a98c26c into NixOS:master Apr 15, 2017
@offlinehacker
Copy link
Contributor

Why did you need toString? imap nethod should always return numbers.

@peterhoeg
Copy link
Member Author

Why did you need toString? imap nethod should always return numbers.

Because 10+i isn't being interpolated automatically inside the string.

@peterhoeg peterhoeg deleted the f/k8s branch April 15, 2017 08:53
@offlinehacker
Copy link
Contributor

ah yes, of course, tnx

@peterhoeg peterhoeg restored the f/k8s branch April 16, 2017 07:43
@peterhoeg peterhoeg deleted the f/k8s branch April 16, 2017 08:59
@peterhoeg peterhoeg restored the f/k8s branch April 16, 2017 15:45
@peterhoeg peterhoeg deleted the f/k8s branch April 16, 2017 23:31
@peterhoeg peterhoeg restored the f/k8s branch April 17, 2017 00:35
@peterhoeg peterhoeg deleted the f/k8s branch April 17, 2017 08:59
@peterhoeg peterhoeg restored the f/k8s branch April 17, 2017 13:32
@peterhoeg peterhoeg deleted the f/k8s branch May 9, 2017 07:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants