Skip to content

Eclipse 4.7 oxygen: cpp & modeling #27073

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

jerith666
Copy link
Contributor

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing
    (nix.useSandbox on NixOS,
    or option build-use-sandbox in nix.conf
    on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • Linux
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

I've tested that the 64-bit versions build and launch. I've only tested that the 32-bit versions build -- launching causes errors because the surrounding GTK etc. are 64-bit.

Sorry, something went wrong.

@mention-bot
Copy link

@jerith666, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @rycee, @goetzst and @edolstra to be potential reviewers.

@rycee
Copy link
Member

rycee commented Jul 3, 2017

Looks very good. I think it would be nice to keep the 4.6 expressions for a little while, but I might be alone in this opinion.

@jerith666
Copy link
Contributor Author

I wasn't sure what the convention was -- the expressions were much more haphazard back when 4.6 came out, so it was hard to tell. Personally, I'd guess that anyone who's tracking unstable/master rather than stable is willing to have their eclipse updated pretty quickly after upstream releases. But, I'm happy to keep the 4.6 expressions if that's what you prefer. :)

@rycee
Copy link
Member

rycee commented Jul 10, 2017

I think it is OK to remove the old ones, if anybody feels strongly about keeping them they are easy to resurrect. Many thanks for the contribution! Rebased into master in c3d036d.

@rycee rycee closed this Jul 10, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants