-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 281
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
RD-253 gimbal: @PhineasFreak I notice the stock-cline RD-253 we have …
…has 2-plane gimbal but this does not. For now I'm harmonizing this way, but we could also harmonize the other way. Thoughts? (It's the usual historical-accuracy-vs-flexibility dealie, IMO...)
- v17.17.0.0
- v17.16.0.0
- v17.15.0.0
- v17.14.0.0
- v17.13.0.0
- v17.12.0.0
- v17.11.0.0
- v17.10.1.0
- v17.10.0.0
- v17.9.0.0
- v17.8.0.0
- v17.7.1.0
- v17.7.0.0
- v17.6.2.0
- v17.6.1.0
- v17.6.0.1
- v17.6.0.0
- v17.5.1.2
- v17.5.1.1
- v17.5.1.0
- v17.5.0.0
- v17.4.4.1
- v17.4.4.0
- v17.4.3.1
- v17.4.3.0
- v17.4.2.1
- v17.4.2.0
- v17.4.1.0
- v17.4.0.0
- v17.3.0.0
- v17.2.0.0
- v17.1.0.0
- v17.0.0.0
- v16.4.0.0
- v16.3.0.0
- v16.2.0.0
- v16.1.2.0
- v16.1.1.0
- v16.1.0.0
- v16.0.1.0
- v16.0.0.0
- v15.0.1.0
- v15.0.0.0
- v14.24.1.0
- v14.24.0.0
- v14.23.0.0
- v14.22.0.0
- v14.21.0.0
- v14.20.0.0
- v14.19.0.0
- v14.18.1.0
- v14.18.0.0
- v14.17.0.0
- v14.16.0.0
- v14.15.0.0
- v14.14.0.0
- v14.13.0.0
- v14.12.0.0
- v14.11.0.0
- v14.10.0.0
- v14.9.0.0
- v14.8.0.0
- v14.7.0
- v14.6.0.0
- v14.5.1.0
- v14.5.0.0
- v14.4.1.0
- v14.4.0.0
- v14.3.0.0
- v14.2.0.0
- v14.1.3.0
- v14.1.2.0
- v14.1.1.0
- v14.1.0
- v14.0.0
- v13.1.1
- v13.1.0
- v13.0.1
- v13.0.0
- v12.8.1
- v12.8.0
- v12.7.4
- v12.7.3
- v12.7.2
- v12.7.1
- v12.7.0
- v12.6.0
- v12.5.0
- v12.1.0
- v12.0.0
- v1.2.3.8
- v1.2.3.7
- v1.2.3.6
- v1.2.3.4
- v1.2.3.3
- v1.2.3.2
- v1.2.3.1
1 parent
bc714fa
commit 6fd3d5f
Showing
1 changed file
with
4 additions
and
4 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
6fd3d5f
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It was done on the basis of the real engine but it is probably much better to have dual-axis gimbaling, as it allows for non-historic vehicles to be made (e.g. a 2x RD-275 first stage).
TL;DR: it is better with full gimbal capability.
6fd3d5f
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok! I'm happy with that. At some point I need to write a better way to have optional (with more mass) gimbaling added to engines...