Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
RD-253 gimbal: @PhineasFreak I notice the stock-cline RD-253 we have …
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history 
…has 2-plane gimbal but this does not. For now I'm harmonizing this way, but we could also harmonize the other way. Thoughts? (It's the usual historical-accuracy-vs-flexibility dealie, IMO...)
  • Loading branch information
@NathanKell
NathanKell committed Jul 18, 2017
1 parent bc714fa commit 6fd3d5f
Showing 1 changed file with 4 additions and 4 deletions.
8 changes: 4 additions & 4 deletions GameData/RealismOverhaul/RO_SuggestedMods/RealEngines/RO_RealEngines_Russian.cfg
View file
Expand Up @@ -1915,10 +1915,10 @@

@MODULE[ModuleGimbal]
{
@gimbalRangeYP = 6.0
@gimbalRangeYN = 6.0
@gimbalRangeXP = 0
@gimbalRangeXN = 0
%gimbalRangeYP = 6.0
%gimbalRangeYN = 6.0
%gimbalRangeXP = 6.0
%gimbalRangeXN = 6.0
}

!RESOURCE,*{}
Expand Down

2 comments on commit 6fd3d5f

@PhineasFreak
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It was done on the basis of the real engine but it is probably much better to have dual-axis gimbaling, as it allows for non-historic vehicles to be made (e.g. a 2x RD-275 first stage).

TL;DR: it is better with full gimbal capability.

@NathanKell
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok! I'm happy with that. At some point I need to write a better way to have optional (with more mass) gimbaling added to engines...

Please sign in to comment.