Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
4.9 is the latest longterm kernel.
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
shlevy committed Jan 20, 2017
1 parent 1feedf2 commit 0fdef7d
Showing 1 changed file with 1 addition and 1 deletion.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion pkgs/top-level/all-packages.nix
Expand Up @@ -11407,7 +11407,7 @@ in
});

# The current default kernel / kernel modules.
linuxPackages = linuxPackages_4_4;
linuxPackages = linuxPackages_4_9;
linux = linuxPackages.kernel;

# Update this when adding the newest kernel major version!
Expand Down

14 comments on commit 0fdef7d

@edolstra
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yay!

@globin
Copy link
Member

@globin globin commented on 0fdef7d Jan 20, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🎉

@marcinfalkiewicz
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pity ZFS doesn't have 4.9 support in stable release yet.

@vcunat
Copy link
Member

@vcunat vcunat commented on 0fdef7d Jan 21, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Any idea why this broke some of our tests? I tested that reverting this would fix nixos.tests.nat.standalone.x86_64-linux; the other NAT test is probably the same and there might be more (these two are now blocking unstable-small).

@vcunat
Copy link
Member

@vcunat vcunat commented on 0fdef7d Jan 21, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems to be the root symptom (it's an FTP session):

client# > EPRT |1|192.168.1.1|37984|
-client# < 200 EPRT command successful. Consider using EPSV.
+client# < 500 Illegal EPRT command.

@vcunat
Copy link
Member

@vcunat vcunat commented on 0fdef7d Jan 21, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That is, active FTP stops working while passive seems still OK.

@vcunat
Copy link
Member

@vcunat vcunat commented on 0fdef7d Jan 21, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is a new thing in the log:

client# [    4.777473] nf_conntrack: automatic helper assignment is deprecated and it will be removed soon. Use the iptables CT target to attach helpers instead.
router# [    5.021706] nf_conntrack: automatic helper assignment is deprecated and it will be removed soon. Use the iptables CT target to attach helpers instead.

@shlevy
Copy link
Member Author

@shlevy shlevy commented on 0fdef7d Jan 21, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Have you checked that this isn't just a transient failure? It seems very odd that an application-level FTP issue (illegal command) would be caused by a kernel bump...

@vcunat
Copy link
Member

@vcunat vcunat commented on 0fdef7d Jan 21, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I did, of course. Hydra tried several times and I also tried locally once (and once with kernel reverted).

@vcunat
Copy link
Member

@vcunat vcunat commented on 0fdef7d Jan 21, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I suspect some changes in netfilter might've broken our firewall rules, but my knowledge around these things is almost void.

@globin
Copy link
Member

@globin globin commented on 0fdef7d Jan 21, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Mic92
Copy link
Member

@Mic92 Mic92 commented on 0fdef7d Jan 21, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@vcunat regarding zfs: #21578

@vcunat
Copy link
Member

@vcunat vcunat commented on 0fdef7d Jan 21, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

(I didn't mention ZFS.)

@Mic92
Copy link
Member

@Mic92 Mic92 commented on 0fdef7d Jan 21, 2017

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@dwe11er regarding zfs: #21578

Please sign in to comment.