Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Stomp #231

Merged
merged 7 commits into from Apr 19, 2018
Merged

Stomp #231

merged 7 commits into from Apr 19, 2018

Conversation

kathychurch
Copy link
Contributor

This implements a STOMP client, useful for sending/receiving messages to rabbitmq, activemq, etc. It also supports connecting to the STOMP server through an HTTP proxy. Basic tests and example included.

@prologic
Copy link
Member

prologic commented Jun 5, 2017 via email

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@9f8306c). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is 29.55%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master     #231   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   74.48%           
=========================================
  Files             ?       84           
  Lines             ?     7034           
  Branches          ?        0           
=========================================
  Hits              ?     5239           
  Misses            ?     1795           
  Partials          ?        0
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
circuits/protocols/stomp/__init__.py 100% <100%> (ø)
circuits/protocols/stomp/client.py 21.6% <21.6%> (ø)
circuits/protocols/stomp/transport.py 24.56% <24.56%> (ø)
circuits/protocols/stomp/events.py 59.01% <59.01%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9f8306c...e77fa87. Read the comment docs.

@prologic prologic merged commit f21e80a into circuits:master Apr 19, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants