Skip to content

json-server: init a 0.10.1 #26266

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 31, 2017
Merged

json-server: init a 0.10.1 #26266

merged 1 commit into from
May 31, 2017
+8,759 −8,326

Conversation

res0nat0r
Copy link

Motivation for this change
  • new node package
Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing
    (nix.useSandbox on NixOS,
    or option build-use-sandbox in nix.conf
    on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • Linux
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Sorry, something went wrong.

Added json-server-0.10.1

Verified

This commit was signed with the committer’s verified signature. The key has expired.
Mic92 Jörg Thalheim
GPG key ID: B3F5D81B0C6967C4
Expired
Verified
Learn about vigilant mode
dd2aeb0
@pSub pSub added the 8.has: package (new) This PR adds a new package label May 31, 2017
@Mic92 Mic92 changed the title init: json-server-0.10.1 json-server: init a 0.10.1 May 31, 2017
@Mic92 Mic92 merged commit 634f5f0 into NixOS:master May 31, 2017
@res0nat0r res0nat0r deleted the json-server-0.10.1 branch June 5, 2017 15:00
@res0nat0r res0nat0r restored the json-server-0.10.1 branch September 13, 2017 16:44
@res0nat0r res0nat0r deleted the json-server-0.10.1 branch February 8, 2018 00:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
8.has: package (new) This PR adds a new package
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
3 participants
@res0nat0r @pSub @Mic92