Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

tracefilegen: 2015-11-14 -> 2017-05-13 #32027

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 25, 2017
Merged

tracefilegen: 2015-11-14 -> 2017-05-13 #32027

merged 1 commit into from Nov 25, 2017

Conversation

andir
Copy link
Member

@andir andir commented Nov 25, 2017

Motivation for this change

Updated while resolving the build issue with gcc7 that is being tracked
in #31747.

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option build-use-sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@andir
tracefilegen: 2015-11-14 -> 2017-05-13
4bda3c4 
Updated while resolving the build issue with gcc7 that is being tracked
in NixOS#31747.
@andir
Copy link
Member Author

andir commented Nov 25, 2017

I submitted an upstream patch to get rid of the patch I had to include in this commit: GarCoSim/TraceFileGen#7

@Mic92 Mic92 merged commit 8136800 into NixOS:master Nov 25, 2017
@andir andir deleted the gcc-7-tracefilegen branch November 25, 2017 14:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
8.has: package (update) 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
4 participants
@andir @pSub @Mic92 @GrahamcOfBorg