Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

nettle: 3.3 -> 3.4 #31853

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 27, 2017
Merged

nettle: 3.3 -> 3.4 #31853

merged 1 commit into from Nov 27, 2017

Conversation

lsix
Copy link
Member

@lsix lsix commented Nov 20, 2017 •
edited by grahamc

Motivation for this change

This is both a bugfix release and a feature release (see http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2017-11/msg00007.html). I am not sure if we want to backport it to release-17.09 (my preference would be yes). @globin @fpletz I let you decide to port it or not.

BR.

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option build-use-sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@vcunat vcunat merged commit 14a754f into NixOS:staging Nov 27, 2017
vcunat added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 27, 2017
@vcunat
Merge #31853: nettle: 3.3 -> 3.4
40a2973
@lsix lsix deleted the update_nettle branch August 22, 2019 07:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
1.severity: mass-rebuild 8.has: package (update) 10.rebuild-darwin: 101-500 10.rebuild-linux: 501+
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
4 participants
@lsix @pSub @vcunat @GrahamcOfBorg