make-disk-image: use faketime to get a consistent timestamp #31469
+11
−3
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This fixes NixOS#28768 because during an image build, Nix sees bad store timestamps and attempts to fix them, but can't fix them on a running system (due to being inside a builder). Since timestamps on the store are supposed to be 1 anyway, if we fix this, that fixes image building inside booted images made this way. Note that this adds quite a bit of noise to the output, because running `cptofs` under `faketime` causes a bunch of seemingly spurious error messages and my attempts to suppress them all failed. We'll fix it when `cptofs` gets a native timestamp preservation feature.
copumpkin
added
the
6.topic: nixos
GrahamcOfBorg
added
10.rebuild-darwin: 0
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backporting f5b3f2c to 17.09 because it breaks images built on the release.
I've built images with the new code and tested that they boot, and I've checked that the timestamps in the image are indeed 1. No automated tests for that yet, but maybe someday.
Note that this makes the image generation script noisier for reasons I don't understand yet and couldn't suppress easily.
@edolstra this is the commit I asked you to wait for before you made a new batch of AMIs.