Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

rustracer: 2.0.9 -> 2.0.12 #31717

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Nov 17, 2017
Merged

rustracer: 2.0.9 -> 2.0.12 #31717

merged 2 commits into from Nov 17, 2017

Conversation

Mic92
Copy link
Member

@Mic92 Mic92 commented Nov 15, 2017

Motivation for this change
Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option build-use-sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@Mic92
rustcSrc: remove unrelated files
79aee3b 
This package is used to provide semantic completion in tools like racer
and is equivalent to rust-src in rustup. This commit gets rid of a
number of files not required for completion.
@Mic92
rustracer: 2.0.9 -> 2.0.12
1d8f539 
don't hard-code RUST_SRC_PATH so it can be overwritten by users/rustup
@Mic92 Mic92 changed the title Rustracer rustracer: 2.0.9 -> 2.0.12 Nov 15, 2017
@Mic92 Mic92 merged commit 0bab82b into NixOS:master Nov 17, 2017
@Mic92 Mic92 deleted the rustracer branch November 17, 2017 08:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@orivej orivej orivej approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
8.has: package (update) 10.rebuild-darwin: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
4 participants
@Mic92 @orivej @c0bw3b @GrahamcOfBorg