Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ihaskell: remove service configuration. #22268

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jan 30, 2017
Merged

ihaskell: remove service configuration. #22268

merged 1 commit into from Jan 30, 2017

Conversation

vaibhavsagar
Copy link
Member

Motivation for this change

IHaskell is not yet GHC 8 compatible. See #22047 for more details.

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing
    (nix.useSandbox on NixOS,
    or option build-use-sandbox in nix.conf
    on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • Linux
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@mention-bot
Copy link

@vaibhavsagar, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @edwtjo, @ikervagyok and @peti to be potential reviewers.

Copy link
Contributor

@teh teh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! I can't merge but I think @vcunat has context and can merge.

@edwtjo
Copy link
Member

edwtjo commented Jan 29, 2017

Please do not remove wrapper.nix nor the ihaskell.nix service. Commenting them out from module-list.nix and all-packages.nix is preferable.

See #22047. This change should be reverted after IHaskell has been
updated to support GHC 8.
@vaibhavsagar
Copy link
Member Author

Sure, I've updated the pull request accordingly.

@joachifm
Copy link
Contributor

Can't it be made to use an older GHC?

@teh
Copy link
Contributor

teh commented Jan 29, 2017

@joachifm Sadly no - as discussed in #22047 we tried that but ran into other incompatibilities.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

7 participants