Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

IO::EWOULDBLOCKWaitReadable Exception class not defined #4473

Closed
Abdulrazak-Alkl opened this issue Feb 3, 2017 · 5 comments
Closed

IO::EWOULDBLOCKWaitReadable Exception class not defined #4473

Abdulrazak-Alkl opened this issue Feb 3, 2017 · 5 comments

Comments

@Abdulrazak-Alkl
Copy link

Environment

  • JRuby version
    jruby 9.1.7.0 (2.3.1) 2017-01-11 68056ae Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 24.80-b11 on 1.7.0_80-b15 +jit [linux-x86_64]

  • Operating system
    Linux abd-laptop 3.16.0-031600-generic #201408031935 SMP Sun Aug 3 23:36:11 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux

I have trouble in using bunny gem (https://github.com/ruby-amqp/bunny) with above environment

The Error:

NameError: uninitialized constant IO::EWOULDBLOCKWaitReadable
org/jruby/RubyModule.java:3344:in `const_missing'

@headius
Copy link
Member

headius commented Feb 8, 2017

It looks like we bind EAGAINWaitReadable but not EWOULDBLOCKWaitReadable. Not sure where the latter is being used. Will investigate.

@headius
Copy link
Member

headius commented Feb 8, 2017

We need to get the complete backtrace for this. I could find no reference to EWOULDBLOCKWaitReadable in JRuby, so I suspect this is coming from some external library.

If you can provide a reproduction, that would be best. Otherwise,

  1. Trigger the error and capture the full backtrace.
  2. Trigger the error while passing -Xbacktrace.style=full to JRuby.
  3. Put both traces in a gist and add a comment here.

I have the following trivial patch that ensures this class is defined, but I'd like to know who's trying to access it.

diff --git a/core/src/main/ruby/jruby/kernel/io.rb b/core/src/main/ruby/jruby/kernel/io.rb
index 69fb8b5..753d6d8 100644
--- a/core/src/main/ruby/jruby/kernel/io.rb
+++ b/core/src/main/ruby/jruby/kernel/io.rb
@@ -7,6 +7,19 @@ class IO
     include IO::WaitWritable
   end
 
+  if Errno::EAGAIN == Errno::WOULDBLOCK
+    IO::EWOULDBLOCKWaitReadable = IO::EAGAINWaitReadable
+    IO::EWOULDBLOCKWaitWritable = IO::EAGAINWaitWritable
+  else
+    class EWOULDBLOCKWaitReadable < Errno::EWOULDBLOCK
+      include IO::WaitReadable
+    end
+
+    class EWOULDBLOCKWaitWritable < Errno::EWOULDBLOCK
+      include IO::WaitWritable
+    end
+  end
+
   class EINPROGRESSWaitWritable < Errno::EINPROGRESS
     include IO::WaitWritable
   end

@headius
Copy link
Member

headius commented Feb 9, 2017

I have pushed #4486 that should fix this, but without knowing what caused it I can't be sure. This will have to wait on feedback from @Abdulrazak-Alkl.

@Abdulrazak-Alkl
Copy link
Author

You can find backtrace in below link:
https://gist.github.com/Abdulrazak-Alkl/0e2ffcb709044b60c7ef0e075c3f0265

@headius
Copy link
Member

headius commented Feb 13, 2017

Ok, it looks like this is an oversight in JRuby. We defined the EAGAIN version but not the EWOULDBLOCK version, and this is the first case where someone actually wanted that class to be defined. I'll merge the patch...should be good.

headius added a commit to headius/jruby that referenced this issue Feb 13, 2017
headius added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 13, 2017
Set up EWOULDBLOCKWaitReadable/Writable if not present. Fix #4473
eregon pushed a commit to ruby/spec that referenced this issue Feb 26, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants