Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

x86_64-musl bootstrap: refresh bootstrap tools package #36384

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Dec 31, 2018

Conversation

dtzWill
Copy link
Member

@dtzWill dtzWill commented Mar 6, 2018

"Native"-built: Seems to work better in non-sandboxed builds[1]
Symlinks preserved: (#36364)
Significantly smaller: (#36383)

Resulting size is about the same as what is currently
used in nixpkgs master (compressed), but smaller
(161M -> 101M).

Most notable difference is that this uses gcc7.

[1] such as often used in docker containers.

  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option build-use-sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@c0bw3b
Copy link
Contributor

c0bw3b commented Dec 2, 2018

@dtzWill still confident to merge this? :)
LGTM

@c0bw3b
Copy link
Contributor

c0bw3b commented Dec 8, 2018

@dtzWill ping?

@dtzWill
Copy link
Member Author

dtzWill commented Dec 31, 2018

Oh, this doesn't actually include the commits over in #36383 -- they were just what I used for generating the tarballs. Awesome, this means resolving conflicts over there won't require regenerating and perma-hosting more tarballs for no reason :P.

@dtzWill
Copy link
Member Author

dtzWill commented Dec 31, 2018

I tested this rather thoroughly previously-- it's conceivable the new bootstrap tarballs are newly incompatible in some subtle way introduced since then, but I think that's unlikely and especially unlikely to be due to tarball being wrong. Hopefully I don't eat those words ;).

Will give this at least a bit of new testing but otherwise I say merge!

@dtzWill
Copy link
Member Author

dtzWill commented Dec 31, 2018

@GrahamcOfBorg build pkgsMusl.bash pkgsMusl.lzip

@dtzWill dtzWill merged commit 1bb4e5c into NixOS:master Dec 31, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants