New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fflas-ffpack: 2.2.2 -> 2.3.2 #36437
fflas-ffpack: 2.2.2 -> 2.3.2 #36437
Conversation
89e6559
to
c3db41b
Compare
I am not sure Nixpkgs is usable on any |
For what its worth, arch and debian both disable it in their packages. Gentoo has this
|
c3db41b
to
c93579d
Compare
I rebased on master and changed the commit message (since the update part was already merged in #37628). |
@GrahamcOfBorg build fflas-ffpack |
Failure on aarch64-linux (full log) Attempted: fflas-ffpack Partial log (click to expand)
|
No attempt on x86_64-darwin (full log) The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on x86_64-darwin: fflas-ffpack Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on x86_64-linux (full log) Attempted: fflas-ffpack Partial log (click to expand)
|
Apparently this fails on aarch64 because its dependency
|
ATLAS seems to have some support for ARM64, but maybe building it is complicated. Frankly, I haven't yet needed to use something where I cared about specific choice of LAS. But sometimes library build systems have interesting preferences (and I forget to revisit the situation when they get better). So, dropping the dependency is fine with me if it builds. |
In #10808 it sounds like it would be relatively unproblematic to just disable atlas for aarch64. |
Dropped the dependency in #39384. |
I've been meaning to add more x86_32 variants. Someday... |
Motivation for this change
fflas-ffpack was outdated.
This updates it, makes it more reproducible / less error-prone and enables checks.
Things done
build-use-sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS)nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
./result/bin/
)