New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
gawk: 4.2.0 -> 4.2.1 #36126
gawk: 4.2.0 -> 4.2.1 #36126
Conversation
I think this belong into staging. |
Should I rebase? This triggers a mass rebuild, but besides that hopefully nothing breaks. Depending on when staging will be merged, this PR could also be merged into master prior to that. |
Yes, please. We don't want mass-rebuilds on master to avoid as slows down development. |
Can you elaborate on what was broken in 4.2.0 that this fixes? Mostly just curious :). |
@dtzWill see ethersex/ethersex#506 I did not try to find the actual bug, it seemed like a very (too) deep rabbit hole, so I stopped and inversed. 🐰 😸 🎩 🏃♀️ In short, to reproduce you have to do
the result should be an ncurses interface similar to that one: |
7e6c989
to
babb7be
Compare
✅ force pushed 🔥 |
@GrahamcOfBorg build gawk please |
Success on x86_64-linux (full log) Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on x86_64-darwin (full log) Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on aarch64-linux (full log) Partial log (click to expand)
|
@GrahamcOfBorg eval |
Motivation for this change
4.2.0 broke some stuff for me
Things done
build-use-sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS)nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
./result/bin/
)