New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
planner: 0.14.6 -> 20170429 #25109
planner: 0.14.6 -> 20170429 #25109
Conversation
@amiloradovsky, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @rasendubi and @aske to be potential reviewers. |
Have you suggested to upstream developers to make a release? I find it very wrong when downstreams like Nixpkgs have to use unreleased software. Making a release can be as simple as "git tag && git push" (although many have projects have some more steps). Unless planner is dead upstream, they should make a release! |
@bjornfor No, but I was told that "No release planned in the foreseeable future so it may take a while to reach distributions, but at least it’s upstreamed now." -- So I doubt I should suggest it. |
@amiloradovsky: I don't understand that quote at all. (If they don't make releases, the releases will never reach distributions. What is upstreamed?) |
@amiloradovsky: Ok, I see now. So you first proposed some patches to planner in Nixpkgs, to fix some bugs. It was suggested instead to apply those patches upstream. You proposed the patches upstream and they integrated them. Now upstream has 5+ years of features and bug fixes since the latest release, but still have no plans of a release? That's crazy. You should definitely suggest they make a release :-) |
"The requested URL /archives/planner-dev-list/2017-April/thread.htm was not found on this server." |
@bjornfor Ah, it must be |
The last patch has just been merged, fixed the revision. Waiting... |
99b7a03
to
a0001eb
Compare
Many improvements were performed during the last 5+ years, since the release: mostly minor fixes but *a lot* of them! Plus, corrected and expanded the meta a little bit.
Hash check failed due to a redirect, fixed. |
Motivation for this change
Numerous minor fixes since the release.
Things done
(nix.useSandbox on NixOS,
or option
build-use-sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS)
nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
./result/bin/
)