Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

planner: 20170429 -> split (into three versions) #25771

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

amiloradovsky
Copy link

Provide several versions of the package, trade-off preferences:

  • stable: the official stable release, based on the tarball
  • unstable: the official Git repository, very conservative
  • unofficial: including few more of the proposed patches
    and enabling few more of the available features
Motivation for this change

Provide more choice.

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing
    (nix.useSandbox on NixOS,
    or option build-use-sandbox in nix.conf
    on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • Linux
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@mention-bot
Copy link

@amiloradovsky, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @rasendubi and @aske to be potential reviewers.

Provide several versions of the package, trade-off preferences:

- stable: the official stable release, based on the tarball
- unstable: the official Git repository, very conservative
- unofficial: including few more of the proposed patches
  and enabling few more of the available features

enableParallelBuilding = true;
let
callPackage = newScope stdenv;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a specific reason for using this over the simpler import ./foo.nix { inherit stdenv; ... }?

@jtojnar
Copy link
Contributor

jtojnar commented Jun 2, 2018

Looks like https://gitlab.com/amiloradovsky/planner/commit/23699814d5cc425b89baa20236a802f28dca7c2c has been merged upstream, so unofficial is no longer needed. It does not make much sense sense to publish ancient stable versions, I would just bump the rev of planner and add the extra features there.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants