Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

neko: 2.0.0 -> 2.1.0 #21072

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Dec 13, 2016
Merged

neko: 2.0.0 -> 2.1.0 #21072

merged 3 commits into from Dec 13, 2016

Conversation

boronine
Copy link
Contributor

@boronine boronine commented Dec 11, 2016

Motivation for this change

The motivation was to add Darwin support to Neko. I bumped the version to 2.1.0 where there the build process has been improved and dependencies have been updated. The patch specified in the previous version of this build has been merged into 2.1.0.

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing
    (nix.useSandbox on NixOS,
    or option build-use-sandbox in nix.conf
    on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • Linux
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@mention-bot
Copy link

@boronine, thanks for your PR! By analyzing the history of the files in this pull request, we identified @aszlig, @dezgeg and @MarcWeber to be potential reviewers.

@boronine
Copy link
Contributor Author

Looking into breakage.

@boronine
Copy link
Contributor Author

Looks like this is the culprit: HaxeFoundation/neko#131

Still can't reproduce the actual error :(

@boronine
Copy link
Contributor Author

Patched version passes tests! I'm guessing the error was a result of an interaction of the kernel with Neko's low-level ELF concatenation hackery. The patches swap in a more robust technique, and should become part of the next release.

@dezgeg dezgeg merged commit c5ed164 into NixOS:master Dec 13, 2016
@boronine boronine deleted the neko-2.1.0 branch December 13, 2016 17:15
@boronine boronine mentioned this pull request Dec 13, 2016
7 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants