New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Poezio bump #48545
Poezio bump #48545
Conversation
No attempt on x86_64-darwin (full log) The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on x86_64-darwin: poezio Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on aarch64-linux (full log) Attempted: poezio Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on x86_64-linux (full log) Attempted: poezio Partial log (click to expand)
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi,
Thanks for the PR,
Can the slixmpp
declaration be moved outside of the python-packages.nix
file while it is being updated? (it should go into pkgs/development/python-modules/slixmpp/default.nix
).
On another subject, I guess (hope) we can depend on gnupg
instead of gnupg1
. This will require some investigation and tests, but it would be nice to rely on the main maintained branch instead of the old 1 branch.
I have built and launched your updated version of poezio
and it works as expected! Thanks
I've tentatively switched the references to gnupg rather than gnupg1, but I don't use the gpg functionality myself so I haven't tested it. |
No attempt on x86_64-darwin (full log) The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on x86_64-darwin: poezio Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on aarch64-linux (full log) Attempted: poezio Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on x86_64-linux (full log) Attempted: poezio Partial log (click to expand)
|
I also do not use GPG with poesio on my side, but apparently, archlinux uses the main gnupg (no version requirement mentionned: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/poezio/). I think we can do that on our side. I did not realized on my first read, but could you also move the declaration of poezio outside of python-packages.nix as well? |
🤦♂️ of course |
please rebase onto/target staging due to the large changes in |
@FRidh only slixmpp and poezio are affected, and poezio is the only thing that depends on slixmpp. I've just moved them out, so this shouldn't cause much in the way of rebuilds, so I think master is still the appropriate target. |
It's not about rebuilds, but to prevent merge conflicts. |
No attempt on x86_64-darwin (full log) The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on x86_64-darwin: poezio Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on x86_64-linux (full log) Attempted: poezio Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on aarch64-linux (full log) Attempted: poezio Partial log (click to expand)
|
e3ae6b6
to
d6a003e
Compare
No attempt on x86_64-darwin (full log) The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on x86_64-darwin: poezio Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on x86_64-linux (full log) Attempted: poezio Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on aarch64-linux (full log) Attempted: poezio Partial log (click to expand)
|
Motivation for this change
New upstream version. cc maintainer @lsix
Things done
sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS)nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
./result/bin/
)nix path-info -S
before and after)