-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
rng-tools: 5 -> 6.6, jitterentropy: init at 2.1.2 #48843
Conversation
Wait, don't merge yet. I think there's something wrong with the sources. |
215998f
to
01310a4
Compare
I had the source-hash wrong and it pulled an old source - probably the cache prevented it from failing. I also added the jitterentropy library to use it as a dependency. |
Thank you for tracking its new home and putting yourself as maintainer 👍 (first things first) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Mostly needs fixing the attribute name of jitterentropy
And for broader comments:
|
Thank you for the thorough review! Do we add No, upstream enables everything by default if it sees that the dependency is installed. I disabled the nistbeacon because I don't want to make people's entropy pool unsuitable for cryptography without them knowing because that's probably what they would want to use this for. |
01310a4
to
08fb060
Compare
Yes. It's not the default because some packages break with this, but otherwise it's good practice to add it (after testing) and benefit from faster builds :) Regarding |
Alright :) |
Ah yes... seems you need |
08fb060
to
8ada6f6
Compare
@GrahamcOfBorg build jitterentropy rng-tools |
Success on aarch64-linux (full log) Attempted: jitterentropy The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on aarch64-linux: rng-tools Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on x86_64-linux (full log) Attempted: jitterentropy The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on x86_64-linux: rng-tools Partial log (click to expand)
|
The attribute in |
Yes. If you're up for it it's indeed a good occasion the change the name to And make this package compliant with the naming guidelines |
Comply with naming guidelines
Instead of pkgs.rng_tools which is now an alias
@GrahamcOfBorg build jitterentropy rng-tools |
Success on x86_64-linux (full log) Attempted: jitterentropy, rng-tools Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on aarch64-linux (full log) Attempted: jitterentropy, rng-tools Partial log (click to expand)
|
@JohnAZoidberg I took the liberty to add a commit on top of yours to use the new pkg name in the |
Motivation for this change
New version :)
Things done
sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS)nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
./result/bin/
)nix path-info -S
before and after)