New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
upower: 0.99.7 -> 0.99.8 #47527
upower: 0.99.7 -> 0.99.8 #47527
Conversation
(cherry picked from commit 67ac9c649ffc036c49006191c64555eae2e6012f)
No attempt on x86_64-darwin (full log) The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on x86_64-darwin: upower Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on aarch64-linux (full log) Attempted: upower Partial log (click to expand)
|
Success on x86_64-linux (full log) Attempted: upower Partial log (click to expand)
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could we ask upstream to upload the tarball to the server? GitLab URLs are not predictable.
Oh, right! Looking into where we could ask such a thing I found this on the mailing list: https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/devkit-devel/2018-June/001829.html Also I think this uses a specific tarball artifact that was uploaded for the tag, not the auto-generated tarballs gitlab can produce (which I believe is what has been problematic in the past as the generation can produce differences sometimes). Please take a look at the thread and/or check that this seems about right-- agreed we want a stable URL here :). |
The autogenerated tarballs are just git snapshots, these artefacts are most likely dist tarballs |
So we're agreeing this is good to go? Or...? :) |
I would rather if we could use predictable tarball location, opened an issue upstream: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/upower/upower/issues/80 |
On top of it, 0.99.8 has regressions with accessing udev events and keyboard backlight support. One alternative (taken from Arch) would be to |
Closing in favor of #49395 (which I believe includes fixes for the mentioned regressions). |
Bump.
sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS)nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
./result/bin/
)nix path-info -S
before and after)