Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MCFM: init at 8.2 #48674

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

MCFM: init at 8.2 #48674

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

veprbl
Copy link
Member

@veprbl veprbl commented Oct 18, 2018

Motivation for this change
Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

pkgs/top-level/all-packages.nix Show resolved Hide resolved
pkgs/applications/science/physics/MCFM/default.nix Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
meta = with stdenv.lib; {
description = "Monte Carlo for FeMtobarn processes";
homepage = https://mcfm.fnal.gov;
license = licenses.free;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Glancing at the website and the tarball, I do not see the license anywhere. “free” in licenses generally refers to freedom, not cost, and omitting license means the work is unfree by default.

Copy link
Member Author

@veprbl veprbl Oct 19, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

People working on this software are supported by US DOE or NSF grants, this research is not classified, so it must be public domain. It also setup to link against qcdloop, which is under GPL3, so resulting binaries must be GPL3 as well.

@NixOS NixOS deleted a comment from GrahamcOfBorg Jan 8, 2019
@NixOS NixOS deleted a comment from GrahamcOfBorg Jan 8, 2019
@NixOS NixOS deleted a comment from GrahamcOfBorg Jan 8, 2019
@NixOS NixOS deleted a comment from GrahamcOfBorg Jan 8, 2019
@NixOS NixOS deleted a comment from GrahamcOfBorg Jan 8, 2019
@NixOS NixOS deleted a comment from GrahamcOfBorg Jan 8, 2019
@NixOS NixOS deleted a comment from GrahamcOfBorg Jan 8, 2019
@NixOS NixOS deleted a comment from GrahamcOfBorg Jan 8, 2019
@NixOS NixOS deleted a comment from GrahamcOfBorg Jan 8, 2019
@NixOS NixOS deleted a comment from GrahamcOfBorg Jan 8, 2019
@NixOS NixOS deleted a comment from GrahamcOfBorg Jan 8, 2019
@NixOS NixOS deleted a comment from GrahamcOfBorg Jan 8, 2019
@NixOS NixOS deleted a comment from GrahamcOfBorg Jan 8, 2019
@NixOS NixOS deleted a comment from GrahamcOfBorg Jan 8, 2019
@NixOS NixOS deleted a comment from GrahamcOfBorg Jan 8, 2019
@NixOS NixOS deleted a comment from GrahamcOfBorg Jan 8, 2019
@NixOS NixOS deleted a comment from GrahamcOfBorg Jan 8, 2019
@NixOS NixOS deleted a comment from GrahamcOfBorg Jan 8, 2019
@NixOS NixOS deleted a comment from GrahamcOfBorg Jan 8, 2019
@veprbl veprbl added the 2.status: wait-for-upstream Waiting for upstream fix (or their other action). label Feb 8, 2019
@veprbl veprbl closed this May 17, 2019
@veprbl veprbl deleted the pr/mcfm_init branch December 1, 2020 17:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants