There is no need for adding a "2" in the names and for the aliases IMHO.
Sticking to mozart and mozart-binary is fine and clear.

There is no need for adding a "2" in the names and for the aliases IMHO.
Sticking to mozart and mozart-binary is fine and clear.

Well, I am not too sure about that. the upstream repo is at mozart/mozart2, implying that this is a different project. ArchLinux and debian also use mozart2 as the package name.

You're right, upstream name is mozart2 so we should stick to it.

It feels somewhat weird to have 3 names for the previous v2.0.0-binary package and 1 for the newer v2.0.1 built from source. I'm not sure we should continue to carry the binary pkg after this get merged but that is probably a job for another PR later.

Are there any updates on this pull request, please?

Updated, rebased and fixed ! I guess this can be merged when Ofborg accepts ;-)

Turns out using pname was a bad idea ;-), there was still one reference to it 🤦‍♂️

@GrahamcOfBorg build mozart2

This needs to be rebased. Is the darwin failure reported by ofborg a regression?

@joachifm Thanks, this has been rebased, and updated to fix the OS/X failure. I do not have access to any darwin builder, so this is a blind guess.

@GrahamcOfBorg build mozart2

I think we can have a look at the darwin thing later. Thank you.