New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
pythonPackages.paho-mqtt: 1.1 -> 1.4.0 #48473
Conversation
@GrahamcOfBorg build python3Packages.paho-mqtt python2Packages.paho-mqtt |
Success on aarch64-linux (full log) Attempted: python3Packages.paho-mqtt, python2Packages.paho-mqtt Partial log (click to expand)
|
Failure on x86_64-darwin (full log) Attempted: python3Packages.paho-mqtt, python2Packages.paho-mqtt Partial log (click to expand)
|
tests fail on darwin. could you have a look? |
Success on x86_64-linux (full log) Attempted: python3Packages.paho-mqtt, python2Packages.paho-mqtt Partial log (click to expand)
|
sha256 = "1xg9ppz2lqacd9prsrx93q2wfkjjyla03xlfw74aj1alz9ki5hrs"; | ||
}; | ||
|
||
buildInputs = [ pylama ]; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I suppose this is used for tests, or not? If so, it should be in checkInputs. Also, I think we can avoid including it altogether as it doesn't really make much sense having it running in our build.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
pylama is a linter - right, we don't necessarily need to lint the codebase, although I'd still suggest to keep running the unit tests ;-)
Closing as someone else already pushed a similar change. |
Motivation for this change
Updated to the latest stable release.
cc @mogorman
Things done
sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS)nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
./result/bin/
)nix path-info -S
before and after)