New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
pakcs: 2.0.2-b9 -> 2.0.2 #50487
pakcs: 2.0.2-b9 -> 2.0.2 #50487
Conversation
@GrahamcOfBorg build pakcs |
No attempt on aarch64-linux (full log) The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on aarch64-linux: pakcs Partial log (click to expand)
|
No attempt on x86_64-darwin (full log) The following builds were skipped because they don't evaluate on x86_64-darwin: pakcs Partial log (click to expand)
|
@@ -6,9 +6,11 @@ | |||
let | |||
name = "pakcs-2.0.2"; | |||
|
|||
# Don't switch to development release without a reason, because its | |||
# source updates without version bump. Prefer current release instead. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Apparently it was also 2.0.2
before so what did change here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Mic92 there were series of betas (as seen in commit log) - 2.0.2-b7, then 2.0.2-b9. And I was forced to use betas, because 2.0.1 has fundamental issue (records support is broken) and everything lower doesn't build anymore.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Mic92 sorry for not updating name
approprietary before.
Success on x86_64-linux (full log) Attempted: pakcs Partial log (click to expand)
|
@Mic92 Thanks! |
Motivation for this change
Things done
sandbox
innix.conf
on non-NixOS)nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
./result/bin/
)nix path-info -S
before and after)