Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

gnupg22: 2.2.10 -> 2.2.11 #49831

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 15, 2018
Merged

gnupg22: 2.2.10 -> 2.2.11 #49831

merged 1 commit into from Nov 15, 2018

Conversation

lsix
Copy link
Member

@lsix lsix commented Nov 6, 2018

Motivation for this change

See http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2018-11/msg00003.html for
release information

Once merged, I’ll backport this to staging-18.09 and staging-18.03 since this is a maintenance release.

Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nox --run "nox-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

@GrahamcOfBorg
Copy link

Success on x86_64-linux (full log)

Attempted: gnupg22

Partial log (click to expand)

shrinking /nix/store/ipglbqjp2p3k1yfzaggfgy1dgc7546dh-gnupg-2.2.11/bin/gpg
shrinking /nix/store/ipglbqjp2p3k1yfzaggfgy1dgc7546dh-gnupg-2.2.11/bin/gpgsm
gzipping man pages under /nix/store/ipglbqjp2p3k1yfzaggfgy1dgc7546dh-gnupg-2.2.11/share/man/
strip is /nix/store/rpbg8gmqxhz8g61p1plz5d2srs84pvmv-binutils-2.30/bin/strip
stripping (with command strip and flags -S) in /nix/store/ipglbqjp2p3k1yfzaggfgy1dgc7546dh-gnupg-2.2.11/lib  /nix/store/ipglbqjp2p3k1yfzaggfgy1dgc7546dh-gnupg-2.2.11/libexec  /nix/store/ipglbqjp2p3k1yfzaggfgy1dgc7546dh-gnupg-2.2.11/bin  /nix/store/ipglbqjp2p3k1yfzaggfgy1dgc7546dh-gnupg-2.2.11/sbin
patching script interpreter paths in /nix/store/ipglbqjp2p3k1yfzaggfgy1dgc7546dh-gnupg-2.2.11
/nix/store/ipglbqjp2p3k1yfzaggfgy1dgc7546dh-gnupg-2.2.11/sbin/addgnupghome: interpreter directive changed from "/bin/sh" to "/nix/store/n2hjbpkf4c0m48945ivxs3lmsczzw2rg-bash-4.4-p23/bin/sh"
/nix/store/ipglbqjp2p3k1yfzaggfgy1dgc7546dh-gnupg-2.2.11/sbin/applygnupgdefaults: interpreter directive changed from "/bin/sh" to "/nix/store/n2hjbpkf4c0m48945ivxs3lmsczzw2rg-bash-4.4-p23/bin/sh"
checking for references to /build in /nix/store/ipglbqjp2p3k1yfzaggfgy1dgc7546dh-gnupg-2.2.11...
moving /nix/store/ipglbqjp2p3k1yfzaggfgy1dgc7546dh-gnupg-2.2.11/sbin/* to /nix/store/ipglbqjp2p3k1yfzaggfgy1dgc7546dh-gnupg-2.2.11/bin

@GrahamcOfBorg
Copy link

Success on aarch64-linux (full log)

Attempted: gnupg22

Partial log (click to expand)

shrinking /nix/store/lh31lbnf4jhy7cbdhrdj4gwsq2rjqb10-gnupg-2.2.11/bin/kbxutil
gzipping man pages under /nix/store/lh31lbnf4jhy7cbdhrdj4gwsq2rjqb10-gnupg-2.2.11/share/man/
strip is /nix/store/6dpnd5aniypn8124mmy8f88s4mq2zl07-binutils-2.30/bin/strip
stripping (with command strip and flags -S) in /nix/store/lh31lbnf4jhy7cbdhrdj4gwsq2rjqb10-gnupg-2.2.11/lib  /nix/store/lh31lbnf4jhy7cbdhrdj4gwsq2rjqb10-gnupg-2.2.11/libexec  /nix/store/lh31lbnf4jhy7cbdhrdj4gwsq2rjqb10-gnupg-2.2.11/bin  /nix/store/lh31lbnf4jhy7cbdhrdj4gwsq2rjqb10-gnupg-2.2.11/sbin
patching script interpreter paths in /nix/store/lh31lbnf4jhy7cbdhrdj4gwsq2rjqb10-gnupg-2.2.11
/nix/store/lh31lbnf4jhy7cbdhrdj4gwsq2rjqb10-gnupg-2.2.11/sbin/applygnupgdefaults: interpreter directive changed from "/bin/sh" to "/nix/store/n1kfdl37qpzh3xn6klbym1ay6xpxvmw1-bash-4.4-p23/bin/sh"
/nix/store/lh31lbnf4jhy7cbdhrdj4gwsq2rjqb10-gnupg-2.2.11/sbin/addgnupghome: interpreter directive changed from "/bin/sh" to "/nix/store/n1kfdl37qpzh3xn6klbym1ay6xpxvmw1-bash-4.4-p23/bin/sh"
checking for references to /build in /nix/store/lh31lbnf4jhy7cbdhrdj4gwsq2rjqb10-gnupg-2.2.11...
moving /nix/store/lh31lbnf4jhy7cbdhrdj4gwsq2rjqb10-gnupg-2.2.11/sbin/* to /nix/store/lh31lbnf4jhy7cbdhrdj4gwsq2rjqb10-gnupg-2.2.11/bin
/nix/store/lh31lbnf4jhy7cbdhrdj4gwsq2rjqb10-gnupg-2.2.11

@pbogdan pbogdan mentioned this pull request Nov 7, 2018
Closed
9 tasks
@dywedir dywedir merged commit 361d04b into NixOS:staging Nov 15, 2018
@lheckemann
Copy link
Member

lheckemann commented Nov 16, 2018 •
edited

cherry-picked to staging-18.09: cff4cb6

@lsix
Copy link
Member Author

lsix commented Nov 16, 2018

I actually did push it to 18.09 along side with other cherry-picks this morning… (76a06b0) Should I revert this backport to release-18.09 and wait for staging-18.09 to be merged ? (sorry if I went to a too fast integration into the release branch…)

@lheckemann
Copy link
Member

oh, whoops. Given the amount of rebuilds I think this should only go to staging? I'm not sure though.

@lsix
Copy link
Member Author

lsix commented Nov 16, 2018

Yes, I guess I should have gone for that approach, but hydra seems to have done a good job at the moment: https://hydra.nixos.org/eval/1489936 (less than 200 jobs to go at the moment). And I actually said in the PR message that I would backport those to staging-18.09, not release-18.09… This is definitely my mistake.

But since it is done, and hydra already did most of the job, I think we should leave it there.

@lheckemann
Copy link
Member

Yeah, fair enough. It should merge fine. Comments mentioning your backport, or a reference in the backport commit to the PR, would be helpful to make it visible that you've backported it :)

@dtzWill dtzWill mentioned this pull request Dec 15, 2018
Merged
10 tasks
@lsix lsix deleted the update_gnupg22 branch August 22, 2019 07:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@lheckemann lheckemann lheckemann approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 11-100 10.rebuild-linux: 501+
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
4 participants
@lsix @GrahamcOfBorg @lheckemann @dywedir